Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Tuesday sharply criticized West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, accusing her of remaining silent while violence flared in Murshidabad. He alleged that under the guise of secularism, Banerjee’s government was effectively shielding those responsible for the unrest.

‘Free Hand to Rioters in the Name of Secularism’

Continuing his criticism, the Uttar Pradesh CM blamed the Trinamool Congress (TMC) government for allegedly enabling lawlessness by being soft on violent elements.

“In the name of secularism, they’ve given rioters complete freedom to unleash chaos. Murshidabad has been on fire for a week, and yet the state administration remains a mute spectator. This kind of anarchy must be brought under control,” Adityanath declared.

He painted a dire picture of the violence in the district, which he claimed has persisted for days without meaningful action from the state government.

Opposition Parties Also Under Fire

Yogi Adityanath extended his criticism beyond Mamata Banerjee, calling out opposition parties like the Congress and the Samajwadi Party for their silence on the issue. According to him, their lack of response reflects a selective approach to violence and victimhood.

“The Congress is silent on the riots in Murshidabad. The Samajwadi Party is also quiet,” he said, questioning their commitment to justice, especially when the affected communities include minority Hindus.

He went on to thank the judiciary for stepping in and authorizing the deployment of central forces in the violence-hit areas. “I appreciate the judiciary for ensuring the safety of minority Hindus by facilitating central protection. It’s unfortunate that the courts had to intervene because the state failed to act,” he remarked.

Context: Rising Tensions in Murshidabad

Murshidabad, a district with a sensitive demographic balance and a history of communal tensions, has recently been rocked by violence allegedly connected to disputes over Waqf properties and local power dynamics. The unrest has led to a political face-off between the TMC-led state government and the BJP, with both sides accusing each other of politicizing the crisis.

Critics have slammed Mamata Banerjee’s handling of the situation, saying the state administration’s delayed response allowed the violence to spiral. Adding fuel to the fire, Banerjee’s reported description of the rioters as “messengers of peace” has drawn widespread condemnation from BJP leaders, who argue that such rhetoric emboldens anti-social elements and undermines public trust in governance.

Political Fallout and Broader Implications

Adityanath’s comments are the latest salvo in a growing political battle between the BJP and the TMC. The issue goes beyond Murshidabad—it taps into larger themes of governance, communal harmony, and federal accountability. With both parties looking ahead to upcoming state and national elections, the rhetoric is only expected to intensify.

Observers say Adityanath’s intervention reflects the BJP’s broader strategy to challenge Mamata Banerjee’s leadership not only within West Bengal but on the national stage. Known for his hardline stance and as one of the BJP’s most vocal campaigners, Adityanath’s attack on Banerjee underscores the party’s effort to portray the TMC as weak on law and order and soft on radical elements.

Conclusion: Political Rhetoric Escalates Amid Crisis

As tensions continue in Murshidabad, the political blame game has only deepened. While the BJP accuses the TMC of appeasement and administrative failure, the Trinamool Congress has often accused the BJP of communalizing sensitive issues for political mileage.

Whether or not the violence in Murshidabad subsides soon, the political reverberations are likely to echo in the weeks and months to come. In this high-stakes battle of narratives, Yogi Adityanath’s remarks have once again positioned him as one of the BJP’s most forceful voices against Mamata Banerjee’s leadership model.

Would you like this version adapted into a shorter news brief, a social media summary, or formatted for publication?