RK Family Trust Row Deepens as Priya Kapur Drops Rani Kapur as Trustee :

Priya Kapur Removes Rani Kapur as Trustee from RK Family Trust, Dispute Intensifies Over Sunjay Kapur Estate

A major development has emerged in the ongoing legal and family dispute surrounding the estate of late industrialist Sunjay Kapur, as his wife Priya Kapur has officially removed her mother-in-law Rani Kapur from the RK Family Trust. The move marks a significant escalation in the already intense conflict over control of assets and management of the trust.

According to recent reports, Priya Kapur, who is both a trustee and beneficiary of the RK Family Trust, issued a formal legal notice confirming the removal of Rani Kapur from her role as trustee. The decision came into effect on March 25, 2026, and effectively strips Rani Kapur of any authority to act on behalf of the trust or access its assets and records.

Background of the Dispute

The RK Family Trust, established in 2017, was originally created as a private and irrevocable trust for the benefit of Sunjay Kapur during his lifetime. Following his death in June 2025, the beneficial interests of the trust were transferred to his legal heirs, including his children and immediate family members.

However, tensions within the family soon surfaced, leading to a complex legal battle over the trust’s validity, administration, and ownership of assets. The dispute gained further attention when Rani Kapur approached the Delhi High Court earlier this year, challenging the legitimacy of the trust and seeking control over its assets.

Allegations and Counter-Allegations

The conflict between Priya Kapur and Rani Kapur has been marked by a series of allegations from both sides. Rani Kapur had earlier accused Priya of creating or benefiting from a “fraudulent” trust that allegedly diverted family assets, and sought legal remedies including dissolution of the trust.

In response, Priya Kapur’s recent notice claims that Rani Kapur’s actions were inconsistent with the responsibilities of a trustee and detrimental to the interests of the trust and its beneficiaries. The notice specifically cites breach of fiduciary duties and conduct that allegedly goes against the provisions of the trust deed and applicable law.

Priya further argued that Rani Kapur’s attempt to challenge the trust’s validity while simultaneously asserting rights over its assets represented a conflict of interest. This, according to the notice, justified her removal under the provisions outlined in the trust agreement.

Legal Battle in Court

The matter is currently under consideration in the Delhi High Court, where multiple petitions and counter-petitions have been filed by both parties. Legal experts suggest that the case could have far-reaching implications, not only for the Kapur family but also for broader issues related to trust law and inheritance disputes in India.

The trust itself reportedly holds significant assets linked to major business interests, adding further complexity and high stakes to the dispute. With multiple stakeholders involved, including children from different marriages, the case has become one of the most closely watched inheritance battles in recent times.

Escalation of Family Feud

The removal of Rani Kapur comes shortly after she had attempted to remove Priya Kapur from the same trust, indicating a clear escalation of tensions. This sequence of actions—notice followed by counter-notice—highlights the deep divisions within the family.

Legal observers note that such disputes often arise in high-value estates where questions of succession, control, and asset distribution become contentious. In this case, the emotional and familial dimensions appear to be as significant as the financial aspects.

What Happens Next?

With both sides firmly standing their ground, the dispute is expected to continue in court. The outcome will likely determine not only the control of the RK Family Trust but also the broader distribution of Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

For now, Priya Kapur’s decision effectively sidelines Rani Kapur from the trust’s administration, at least until further legal intervention. Whether this move will withstand judicial scrutiny remains to be seen.